Monday, May 9, 2016
No Major Setbacks


Wednesday, May 4, 2016
Single-momming It


Sunday, May 1, 2016
Battleship


Thursday, April 28, 2016
Blueberry Scones. Yum.


A Big Jump


Sunday, April 24, 2016
Sunny Day


Saturday, April 23, 2016
I'm Just a Phone Call Away


Thursday, April 21, 2016
As expected...


Wednesday, April 20, 2016
First Day In the Hole
I decided a great way to get back to blogging is to take it back to the basics. This blog started just to document my journey to get back lung function and run a mile, back in 2009 by writing what I did daily. So to get back into the groove, I’m bringing it back old school. I came into the hospital for a tune-up yesterday, so I am going to document my stay and what each day looks like. To add a little fun, we are going to make it a he said-she said format; I am going to write what I did during the day and Mandi is going to share her day…if we are feeling really crazy, maybe Mckenna will share her perspective some days here and there.
Hospital Stay: Day 1
He said: Today was like most first days in the Hole…It felt like I had poison flowing through my body. I was tired, my eyes were heavy and I was achy all over. I also did PFTs and ended up having the worst numbers I’ve seen since 2009. I’m not shocked, but seeing an FEV1 of 36% was a bit jolting. You know what they say – Nowhere to go but up!
My lungs are certainly feeling much more junky than normal and I have a stabbing pain that is preventing me from taking a full breath. So, are my lungs really that sick right now? Probably not. But I have a lot of work to do and feeling like this is not acceptable, so I’ll do whatever it takes to dig out of this hole.
Looking forward to the challenge.
She said: Today is our first full day of Ronnie in the hole. It started out awesome because both kids slept well! Bennett was only up once in the night to eat, and Mckenna slept in my bed, so I didn’t hear from her except a little snuggle here and there.
We crammed the day full of activities to help the day go faster. First up was the typical morning routine of cartoons and breakfast, then Bennett had a swim lesson, I volunteered at Keni’s school (Bennett came too). After volunteering, Bennett and I came home, he took a nap while I worked, and then we went back to school to pick up Keni. It was then home for naps. While the kids napped I picked up the house and got a little more work in. Post-naps I met a friend at the gym for leg day. After the gym it was home for dinner, baths, and bed.
All in all it was a great day. How Mckenna behaves usually dictates how good the day feels to me…to be honest. Mckenna was a good little listener with a happy heart today, so the day felt pretty smooth. Unfortunately, we did have a couple little crying bouts by Mckenna because she missed Ronnie, but she recovered and was good otherwise. This stay seems like it bums her out more than stays in the past. The stays after Ronnie’s crazy stay where he was in for longer and I had to be with him for 3 weeks, seem to be harder on her. But she will get it one day!


Tuesday, November 26, 2013
He Said, She Said: The Day We Met
On June 27th, 2008 I got a call from a friend about meeting up with the group for a movie and some drinks. I politely declined as I was determined to spend the next few months holed up in my house and have no resemblance of a social life. Well, I guess you need the backstory on that...
Just one week prior, my girlfriend of over two years and I decided that it would be best to go our separate ways. We had a good relationship, no real issues to speak of, but we knew that it was not a forever type of a thing and continuing the relationship would be futile. I was more sad about losing a friend and someone I enjoyed hanging out with than I was about losing a girlfriend.
After breaking-up, I did a lot of soul-searching and praying and something became very clear to me - I wasn't dating the way God would want me to date and I wasn't dating the type of girls God would want me to date. It's very clear that God wants us to be equally yoked, meaning that both the man and the woman are going in the same direction towards the same God. Even though I had been a part of the church my entire life and had been in relationship with Jesus since my youth, I had yet to date or be in relationship with someone I was equally yoked with. I dated plenty of nice girls, just never the right girl. Ultimately, I knew that if I wanted a life-long successful marriage I would have to find a woman who was in-love with Jesus as much as I was.
I vividly remember humbling myself before God and asking for forgiveness by the way I had been dating. I knew I wasn't dating His way. I also knew that if I ever wanted true success, I would have to date His way.
And now back to June 27th...so I declined to meet up with my friends that day because I had a history of not being able to be social, without meeting someone. I know that sounds stupid, but I very rarely had no one around. I pretty much had a girlfriend, someone I was "dating" or "just a friend" from 1994 to June 2008. I was pretty sure that being alone for a while was exactly what God wanted me to do. Well, He of course had different plans.
After repeated calls and requests from my friends that day, I finally said "yes" to going to the movie after I was promised that I could show up when the movie started and leave when it was finished. Sounded pretty harmless to me, and since you can't talk through a movie, I figured I was in the clear.
I showed up to the movie theater with about 5 minutes to spare and found my friends who were already sitting in their seats. I gave the obligatory wave and hello and sat down next to my buddy Bryan at the end of the row. I knew everyone who was there, except I couldn't quite pinpoint who the girl sitting next to Bryan was. I had met her before, but only briefly and had no idea what her name was. Being the gentleman that I am, I introduced myself to which she responded, "I'm Mandi and we're going to get married one day." Just kidding. She just told me her name and reminded me that she was Bryan's roommate's little sister.
I honestly don't remember if Mandi and I talked before the movie started, but I do know that she laughed at basically anything I said to the group or to Bryan. At the very least, I was happy to have her around because I'm pretty sure my friends were tired of my jokes. In my mind, anyone who made me feel like I was funny deserved a spot in the group :)
After the movie was done (I have no idea what movie it was), I decided to join my friends at a little wine lounge close to the movie theater.
To be continued...



Saturday, April 17, 2010
Are Gene Patents a Good Thing??
Report finds gene patents prevent competition, don’t promote advancement
BY CONNIE KARAMBELAS
A report published Wednesday by Duke University researchers concluded that gene patents and exclusive licensing do more to deter competition in the gene testing market than they do to further the development of new technologies for measuring the risk of disease.
Dr. Robert Cook-Deegan, director of Duke University's Center for Genome Ethics, Law & Policy in Durham, N.C., said, “It's notable that a gene linked to cystic fibrosis is not subject to an exclusive license, yet there is now a vibrant market for tests to identify carriers of the cystic fibrosis gene. This suggests the problem is not patents, per se, but how they are being licensed, particularly by universities.”
Published in the journal Genetics in Medicine, the study’s results are the product of eight case studies on 10 clinical conditions, including cystic fibrosis, hearing loss, breast cancer, colon cancer, Tay-Sachs disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Researchers from the Duke Institute of Genome Sciences and Policy and Duke's Center for Public Genomics conducted the research.
The question of patening genes has been in the news. Last month, a federal judge in New York ruled that patents should never have been granted genes to test for break cancer.
More than 20 percent of the human genome has already been patented by various scientists, academics, and companies. This translates into about 4,000 genes, the Anmerican Civil Liberties Union noted in its case against Myriad Genetics and Laboratories in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Duke researchers found that most of the scientists and researchers they interviewed, specifically pertaining to Alzheimer’s disease, were ambivalent when it came to patenting, and none attributed the races to trace the genetic origins of the disease to patents.
“The races were driven by wanting priority of scientific discovery, prestige, and scientific credit, and the ability to secure funding for additional research based on scientific achievement,” the researchers reported.
While this was reported for Alzheimer’s, the study outlines that the same is primarily true for the other diseases researched. Gene patents did nothing to promote innovation in terms of new technologies or methods for determining disease risk, the Duke researchers reported.
“If patents added ‘the fuel of interest to the fire of genius,’ in Abraham Lincoln’s famous phrase, it was here at best a tiny pile of kindling at the outer margin of a large conflagration,” the researchers wrote.
There are additional problems with exclusivity according to Dr. James P. Evans, a clinical professor in the genetics department at the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill (N.C.), who wrote “Putting patients before patents,” a commentary on the case studies.
A patent holder exclusively licensing a laboratory to conduct the tests for a certain disease risk results in an “inability to obtain second-opinion testing and concerns over quality, given that the most robust means of quality assurance are not available in the context of a single provider,” he said.
When it comes to retesting, an exclusive license could make a difference, said Kevin Noonan, a patent attorney at Chicago-based McDonnel Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff. “If I’m the exclusive licensee I can’t quibble with the person who says that yes, there is a cost that is incurred by having a patent,” he said. “There is a cost however, in not having the test in the first place.”
Evans also has another concern with exclusive licensing: Clinicians who are concerned about a certain laboratory have no alternative to choose from. This, he said, allows the laboratory, rather than the patients, to define the terms of testing.
“That’s a hypothetical,” Noonan said. If the exclusive licensee is doing the test in a certain lab and not doing it very well there is a good chance that people will sue over the incorrect test results and the lab won’t stay in business for very long, he said.
“There are provisions in the law, for tests coming from university labs, where the government can step in and grant a non-exclusive license to another lab. If there is evidence that the lab is doing their job poorly then patients can report this and the exclusive licensee would have to accept a sublicense to another lab,” he said.
See original article at http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=162971


Saturday, April 10, 2010
No Money for Lung Transplants
That's something the 26-year-old Mesa woman never could've done prior to undergoing a double lung transplant last month.
"I couldn't breathe, you know," Prendergast said. "And, taking a deep breath -- I couldn't do that."
Prendergast suffers from cystic fibrosis.
Prior to her surgery at Saint Joseph's Hospital, Prendergast's lungs were less than 20 percent functioning.
Now, her lungs function at more than 100 percent.
Prendergast says her new lungs have given her a new life -- one her fiance, Marc Badalucco, is anxious to share with her.
"We're gonna get married," he said. "We want to travel. It's just everything and anything we've wanted to do -- we're making a list and checking it off."
AHCCCS, Arizona's Medicaid program, paid for Prendergast's double lung transplant -- which can cost anywhere from $250,000 to $650,000.
Because she was so sick, prior to surgery, she couldn't work.
And, because she has a pre-existing condition, private insurance companies wouldn't cover her.
Soon, those who are in the same boat Prendergast is in, may not be afforded a "second chance" at life.
In mid-march, the state legislature voted to eliminate AHCCCS funding for lung transplants and some heart and liver transplants.
Prendergast's mother, Barb Garday, says she's worried for those who may be left out.
"It's almost like, if you can't afford private insurance, you're life isn't worth as much as those who can," said Garday. "What will they do? I don't know what we would've done."
The elimination of funding for some transplants is part of an larger plan for cuts to AHCCCS -- which will likely go into effect in October.
It's something many legislators say they didn't want to have to do.
But, right now, with limited funds, they don't have a choice.


Saturday, September 12, 2009
Health Care Reform: He Said, She Said
One thought though... For CF'ers (and others as well) you aren't really buying health "insurance." Insurance is a bet, on your part and on the part of the insurance company. They are betting that the premiums they charge you, will, on average, be a larger amount than the healthcare they are obligated to pay for. You are betting that it will be cheaper for you to pay a monthly premium, just in case some huge medical bill occurs.
For CF'ers... it ain't a bet. You and the insurance company know there is absolutely no way you could pay premiums high enough to cover the cost of your care. So bottom line... you are asking other people to pay for care you can't afford for yourself.
I would much prefer an insurance system that functions as insurance, and find the best way to provide that as cheaply as possible. And then find a way to deal with those who are un-insurable. Rather than designing all kinds of perverse incentives into an insurance system, to deal with people who insurance isn't really the appropriate means to pay for care.Some more random comments on the post above:
Strike all pre-existing condition clauses?
We don't demand that you be able to buy fire insurance to pay for the damages AFTER your house has burned down. Or flood insurance AFTER it is filled with water. Or car insurance AFTER you've gotten in a wreck. Or life insurance AFTER you've died. If we required the above, it should be pretty obvious that what you are buying is no longer "insurance" in any sense of the word.
So why do we demand that people be able to buy health insurance AFTER they have gotten sick?
As I said above, if you have a pre-existing condition, you aren't insurable in the true sense of the word. I'm not saying I know what the solution is for those with pre-existing conditions, but I do think that basically dismantling the insurance system to deal with those issues is the wrong way to go.More random comments:
"fair pricing despite level of health"
I assume you mean by "fair" that all people pay the same price, regardless of their health?
Once again, compare this to other insurances you buy. Do people demand "fair" pricing for car insurance for someone with a perfect 10 year driving record versus the high school student who has been in 3 accidents already? Or "fair" pricing for life insurance for the 20 year old health nut versus the 95 year old chain smoker? Or "fair" pricing for home insurance for the $100,000 home versus the 4 million dollar mansion?
So why do we demand that all people, regardless of health status, pay the same amount for health insurance?
I know, I know... people don't always have a choice in their health status, while most of the above situations are a choice. But for those who do, I'm not sure I see why their shouldn't be a consequence for health choices. For those who have no choice in their health status... like I said, I'm not sure insurance is the appropriate vehicle for paying for health care."My choices in my care should not be made by my pocket book, but they are, all the time."
Not trying to be offensive, so if it sounds that way, blame it on the limits of internet communication...
Why shouldn't choice in health care be made (at least in part) by money? You make choices every day based on money. Where to live, how big your house is, what kind of car to drive, what kind of job to take, what to eat, how to entertain yourself, etc. Why should health care be any different?
In my mind, part of the problem with the current insurance system is that there isn't ENOUGH decision making based on cost. With most PPO type insurances, there is very little connection between what I pay, and how much something costs. I might only pay 10%, or a $20 co-pay, for something that costs far more. Of course, I am also paying for the rest of it, but through my premiums. There is very little direct connection between the value of a health service, and how much I pay for it.
I really think the HSA route is the way to go, because it has a huge connection between cost and value. We just switched this year, and I find myself constantly asking "Is what we are going to pay for this really worth it?" (just like I do for everything else I purchase.) I NEVER recall thinking that on our PPO. If people aren't asking that question, health care is only going to get more expensive, not less. And the public option makes even MORE of a disconnect between the cost and the value.
Few things that I feel like addressing:
1. Your analogy of other types of insurance is flawed in several ways. If all insurance was ran like health insurance, then we would have a lot of problems. Say that you had a small fire in your house five years ago. It caused no structural damage, few possessions were damaged, you didn't even use insurance money for it, but called out the fire department just to make sure your house was safe. Now five years later you buy a new home and want fire insurance. If they were like the insurance company, they could deny you because of your past history of fire. Or say, you are going to get car insurance. You've never had an accident and have a perfectly clear record. You expect to be covered without a problem. However, it seems your family members seem to crash into anything on the road, and off the road, and have several tickets. The insurance company denies you because of your family history of car wrecks. Both would happen if insurance was ran anything like "health insurance".
Also, not having fire insurance, I take a financial risk if something happens. Not having car insurance, I take a fiscal and legal risk. Not having health insurance? Not only is there a huge financial risk, but you are also risking your life. No other insurance is that true of.
2. Making decisions based on pocket book. Yes, I decide where I live, what I spend descresionary funds on, and how much I drive based on pocket book. But I can live in a cheaper house, not buy that shiny new computer, and drive a 10+ year old car... it's not going to kill me. But not getting drugs, going to the doctor, and millions of other things that are involved in health care very well could kill me.
3. I think of health insurance, or how I think health care should be paid for like the police, or the fire department, or like countless other services that my tax dollars go to. I haven't needed police help in years, but I'm very happy they are there if I need it, and I know that my community is a better place for it. My neighbor had a garage fire this week, that without the quick reaction of my neighbor and the fire department, I would have lost my own home. Again, something I pay for, rarely use, but am very glad they are there when I need it. I don't have kids, but I know that my community is better by tax dollars that go into their education, removing them from abusive situations, and helping them get vaccinated if they can't afford it. I've never been on food stamps, but I know that my community is better if everyone has something to eat. The same thing could be said about healthcare. Yes, I use it often, and many people out there wouldn't, but everyone's lives are made better by everyone having a chance at health. I don't understand how anyone could think differently.
4. HSAs are a crock. Spend a single day in a hospital and the $6,000 bill will eat through nearly every HSA account I've seen. Let's hope you don't need surgery, ongoing medication, or more than one day in the hospital... because not only is your healthcare money gone, but you also can't be insured again.
1) Sure, the analogy isn't perfect. But it is true that people are demanding things of health insurance that we don't demand of any other insurance we buy. And those demands transform it into something that is no longer insurance.So, who do you think wins this one? The "he" or the "she"?
2) Again, I'll agree health care is somewhat different than other things you buy. Although where you live or what you drive could also kill you. My point was more that your comment implies you should be able to decide on your health care options regardless of cost. That isn't reality, just as you don't make any other decision regardless of cost. Which is why people argue that public healthcare always leads to rationing. Because when we don't pay for it directly (ie we make healthcare decisions with little regard to the true cost) we end up demanding far more healthcare than if we paid for it directly. We demand more healthcare than we can collectively pay for. And since the gov't controls the public option, they end up deciding based on the collective pocketbook. Which is exactly what many people are opposed to.
3) So did your neighbor have fire insurance, or did the fire department pay for all the damage caused to his house by the fire? The police only come to collect the evidence after the crime. They do nothing to reimburse you for the ongoing effects of the crime. The fire department shows up to put out the fire. They do nothing to pay for the damage your house suffers (in fact, that is why you buy fire insurance.) I would argue the healthcare equivalent to the police or fire department would be EMTs, which, oddly enough, already exist.
4) Our HSA is working just fine, thank you. And yup, one day in the hospital (which my wife already had this year) will wipe out your HSA account for the year. Which is exactly why you have an insurance policy connected to it. After her hospital stay, we had paid our deductible, and the insurance covers 100%. If I desire, next year I can switch back to the PPO that my employer offers, although I see no reason to do so. HSA's provide an incentive for me to actually attempt to save money, to consider whether the value of the service is actually worth what I am paying for it. It works exactly like insurance should... I pay for the little day to day stuff, but have insurance in case of an emergency. It's not a crock for us, and is actually working quite well so far, even with a major hospital stay.
Here's a great article in the WSJ with some excellent suggestions for how to reform the system, without going to single payer...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html
Saturday, August 8, 2009
The Night We Met by Ronnie and Mandi
I met Ronnie on June 27, 2008. I was home from school for summer break and since I wasn’t from AZ, I tagged along with my brother, Josh, and his friends to a movie. I had been hanging out with them for quite some time, so I knew all of the people going. We were sitting in our seats waiting for the movie to start (I think it was Wanted that we were seeing) when Bryan, one of Josh’s friends, said, “Ronnie’s coming, so we need to save him a seat.” A few minutes later, here comes a guy with khaki shorts, a t-shirt and “the messy hair look” walking up the stairs, stopping at our row. Everyone said their hellos (all knowing each other) and then Bryan said the words that would change my life forever, “Oh yeah, Ronnie, this is Mandi, Josh’s LITTLE sister.” Boom...fireworks, we fell in love and lived happily ever after. Haha I wish! We sat there waiting for the movie to start, Ronnie was telling riddles and having Josh, who’s a genius, solve them in a matter of seconds. Ronnie made several jokes throughout the first 5 minutes and had me cracking up. Point one for Ronnie: He was a funny man. Because he was so funny, I got super nervous to make jokes because funny people have a higher standard when it comes to funny...and I’m afraid I generally don’t make the mark. Suddenly, hunger struck and I went to get some candy. As I crawled over the other members of our group and passed Ronnie, who was on the isle, I asked if anyone needed anything, to which Ronnie replied, “I kinda need to pee, think you could do that for me?” I playfully rolled my eyes and said I’d see what I could do. When I got back I made sure to get a few sexy, intriguing lines in there like, “Want some m&ms” and (handing him the m&ms again) “Help yourself”. I made occasional eye contact with him as he made little comments during the movie, but there unfortunately, that was it.
After the movie we all went to one of our favorite spots, Armitage, to listen to live music. I “happened” to sit next to Ronnie (You will begin to realize, I’m a VERY strategic thinker). I began to ask him questions and soon realized he had JUST gotten out of a relationship. Minus one point for Ronnie: Baggage. I began to poke and prod about him and his ex (had to know why they didn’t work so I could know what NOT to do, right?). He had no bad things to say. One point for Ronnie: Nice guy. Minutes turned into an hours of talking about him, his ex, his life, his CF. What’s that? It was all about him? You betcha...I managed to make him think I wasn’t a big talker...SUCKER. No, I actually enjoyed listening to him talk about himself. He had a way of talking that hooked me. His laugh, his mannerisms, the way his eyes would light up when I would say certain things. I loved it. One point for Ronnie: He was interesting. So I just kept digging. I couldn’t tell you how long we sat there talking. Conversation just came easy with him. There was never a lull. I was hanging on his every word. I remember wishing this night wouldn’t end and that I could learn more about this green-eyed, playful friend of my brother’s. To ensure this wouldn’t be the last I saw of him, I began to plot again. At some point, someone was leaving and mentioned future weekend plans. I quickly threw out an offer to make everyone blueberry pancakes the next morning (genius: where there is food, Ronnie will come). Ronnie agreed to show and Bryan offered up his house. Perfect, this would not be the last I saw of him.
Ronnie and I continued to talk as people trickled out. We eventually decided to leave since it would be an early morning of blueberry bliss. But as we were wrapping up our conversation, music started to be discussed. One point for Ronnie: He loved music. (If you’re keeping score, he’s up in points big time). Ronnie tricked me into listening to the songs he was talking about that I had never heard. Could it be that he too wasn’t ready for the conversation to end? It gave me a little hope (although he’ll tell you he WASN’T interested at all and really just wanted me to hear the songs). We walked to his car, which, to my surprise, was a Ridgeline truck. Why was that surprising? I have no idea...just surprised me. I didn’t know then, but that was the first of many surprises Ronnie had in store for me. We jumped in the FRONT SEAT (for any of you who were trying to predict the story) of his truck and he began to play song after song on his ipod. Before each song he would swear was better than the last, tell a story to set it up, or act amazed that I had never heard it. We sat singing songs, talking, laughing. A few hours past, and we decided that it was actually time to wrap things up, as we would see each other in just a few hours. I gave him a quick hug, told him how awesome it was to meet him and get to talk (I tried to play it cool while still letting him know that I thought he was the coolest thing since snap bracelets), jumped out of his truck, and walked to my car, on air.
I don’t know if I ever told him this, but I had trouble falling asleep that night. I was like a little kid on Christmas eve, anticipating the morning, when I’d get to see him again. And if I had known what I know now about Ronnie, and if I had knew where we would be today, I would have been even more excited.
This is a bench outside of Armitage. Mandi made breakfast and we ate there for our first anniversary. See the post here.